Social media ban threatens ‘final relic’ of Tunisia’s revolution


“Ten years on, there’s nonetheless a worth to pay in Tunisia for talking your thoughts,” mentioned 37-year-old seasoned social media activist Azyz Amami with a sigh.

Amami’s evaluation of the last decade that has elapsed for the reason that revolution that overthrew Zine El Abidine Ben Ali’s regime in January 2011 after 20 years of authoritarian rule is a dark and sobering one.

The democratic transition he helped result in in Tunisia, inspiring widespread mobilisation all through the area and culminating within the Arab Spring, initially fuelled excessive aspirations – from the financial guarantees of the revolution’s motto, “freedom, work and dignity”, to the opportunity of mental and political freedom – in a rustic beforehand topic to strict censorship.

“In 2011, we had been euphoric, we dreamt we’d lastly have the ability to suppose out loud. We had such excessive hopes … we may solely be dissatisfied,” summed up Amina Mansour, one other social media activist focused by then-prime minister Youssef Chahed in 2018 for criticising him on-line.

At the moment, the euphoria of the revolution’s early days has simmered. One is extra more likely to hear the rhetorical query, “Revolution? What revolution?” amid the bubble of chatter within the cafes of Tunis.

But for a time, Tunisia was the poster baby of the Arab Spring. In 2014, its new structure enshrined the fitting to free expression, an historic second.

However with social media now the principle area for political debate, authorities are trying to rein in critics. Freedom of expression – “the final surviving relic of the revolution”, in accordance with activist lawyer Mohamed Ali Bouchiba – is coming below pressure.

“There may be incontestably extra freedom of speech in Tunisia in the present day than there was below Ben Ali. However we now have witnessed a regression just lately, with a rise in lawsuits towards social media activists in comparison with the years instantly after the revolution,” defined Eric Goldstein, deputy director for the Center East and Northern Africa at Human Rights Watch.

All of it actually began in 2018 with Chahed, mentioned Mansour, who was one of many first casualties of the latest crackdown.

Two years into his mandate, Chahed sued her for accusing him of corruption in a social media submit, and he or she was sentenced to 2 months in jail.

Social media activist Amina Mansour was arrested in 2018 for a submit essential of the prime minister [Courtesy: Amina Mansour]

A single mom of three in her 40s, Mansour upends the standard stereotype of the social media activist.

“Individuals are likely to think about I spend my days scrolling down Fb on my laptop. However as a rule, I write my posts in between two chores at residence, or with a soapy finger whereas washing the dishes,” she confessed.

“Chahed’s lawsuit uninhibited different authorities officers and politicians. They thought ‘if the PM does it, why not me?’,” Mansour added.

Bouchiba believes the opportunism of officers after Chahed’s transfer grew right into a loosely coordinated effort by authorities to silence critics by redrawing the boundaries of freedom of expression. “They need to make politics taboo once more,” he mentioned.

At the moment, regardless of some high-profile instances towards activists prosecuted for posting content material perceived as offensive to Islam – resembling Emna Chargui, who was sentenced final 12 months to 6 months in jail for “inciting hatred between religions” after she imitated the verses of the Quran in a social media submit poking enjoyable at COVID-19 – the vast majority of activists are prosecuted for criticising authorities officers, politicians and the safety forces on-line.

“Since 2018, we’ve actually been put by the wringer with this new wave of arrests,” confirmed Bouchiba, often called “the bloggers’ lawyer”.

The previous regulation professor has been on the forefront of each effort to defend social media activists since then.

Confronted with the urgency of this crackdown, he co-founded the NGO Bloggers With out Chains in 2018, devoted to defending pro-bono activists “whose solely crime was to publicly criticise individuals in energy”.

He has represented greater than 40 activists since.

“The revolution had already demonstrated the ability of the web in mobilising individuals. At the moment, politicians are more and more conscious that elections are gained and misplaced on social media, not within the press or on TV,” Bouchiba defined.

Suing social media activists who name them out on-line is a method for politicians, authorities officers and the safety forces to try to maintain their repute clear on these platforms.

The COVID-19 pandemic has compounded this development. Activists denouncing corruption within the dealing with of the epidemic in Tunisia final 12 months triggered an “growing crackdown on social media customers and on-line critics” that “restricted the area for on-line mobilisation”, in accordance with Freedom Home’s 2020 Freedom on the Internet yearly report.

Solely final week, social media activist Anis Mabrouki was sentenced to 4 months in jail for one among his posts on social media calling out native public officers for failing to distribute COVID-19 monetary help promised by the federal government.

In 2018, the International Web Sentiment Survey discovered that fifty % of customers surveyed in Tunisia didn’t really feel protected sharing their views on-line.

The crackdown has not helped. Whereas Mansour’s arrest didn’t dampen her resolve to talk out on the time, it has modified her strategies. In need of censoring herself, she should now watch out how she phrases her posts.

“I can nonetheless communicate my thoughts, but when I don’t need to be arrested once more, I’ve to make use of irony much more than earlier than,” she mentioned. “Lately I introduced my ‘excuses’ to Chahed for giving him the difficulty of getting me arrested.”

‘Insult or disturb’

With the intention to justify their censorship efforts, authorities have dug up a authorized equipment inherited from Tunisia’s darker occasions: legal guidelines from the Ben Ali period.

One of many legal guidelines most frequently invoked towards activists is drawn from Article 86 of the 2001 Telecommunications Code, punishing anybody “utilizing public communication networks to insult or disturb others” with as much as two years in jail.

“The web barely existed again then, not to mention social media. Charging activists below this regulation is a stretch,” mentioned Bouchiba.

The article, closely deployed since 2018, was the truth is not often used throughout Ali’s regime, he famous, which most well-liked to jail activists below the guise of different offences resembling drug possession.

Below growing stress from authorities, some activists are starting to expire of steam.

“On the time, my arrest made me need to communicate out much more. The general public uproar was spectacular: there have been TV crews on the tribunal, on-line campaigning, public figures talking out to assist me, blocked roads,” Mansour recalled.

However just lately, the state of affairs has gone from dangerous to worse. At the moment, it’s totally different, she defined.

“Aside from shut pals, individuals don’t care any extra. The lawsuits, the arrests … it’s develop into normalised. We’re all exhausted. It’s what the authorities need, you realize, to harass us into exhaustion.”

Regardless of these latest setbacks, activists and people who defend them discover one silver lining in in the present day’s state of affairs.

“Evaluating freedom of speech earlier than and after Ben Ali is not possible. Below his regime we merely couldn’t communicate,” Bouchiba reasoned. “Freedom of expression could be threatened in the present day – however not less than we now have some to struggle for.”

Mohamed Ali Bouchiba is the co-founder and secretary common of Bloggers With out Chains [Courtesy: Mohamed Ali Bouchiba]